Archive for Optimization
Bing Announces Release of Updated Bing Webmaster Tools
Posted by: | CommentsBing announced Wednesday the release of their updated Bing Webmaster Tools. According to a recent blog post by Bing titled A New Beginning: Bing Webmaster Tools, they reached out to webmaster and SEO communities for ideas and suggestions on how they could improve their Webmaster Tools. They started over and rebuilt Bing Webmaster Tools from the ground up providing webmasters with more transparency, more control, and more information to aid in optimizing sites for Bing.
They focused on 3 areas in the redesigned Bing Webmaster Tools to help you optimize your websites for Bing:
- Crawl – to provide you with more information on crawl issues (redirects, exclusions, etc.)
- Index – browse the Bing index to verify which directories & pages have been indexed
- Traffic – ability to analyze up to six months of crawling, indexing, and traffic data
Bing Webmaster Tools is still not as robust as Google Webmaster Tools in the information it provides, but it is a step in the right direction. I look forward to additional features they have in the works in the coming months.
Creating a Website that is a True Conversion and Lead Generating Machine
Posted by: | CommentsLet’s Take a Simple Multiple Choice Test:
Question: Who is your site actually built for?
Hint: It’s the same group of people that should be designing your website.
Choose your Answer:
A) Your Company (web design team, marketers, IT, etc)
B) The end user (i.e. your actual or potential customers)
If you chose B, you are correct! If you chose A, then you probably work for a company whose website isn’t effective as it could be and still wondering why.
If your company is like most companies, implemented ideas and then changes to your websites layout, design, navigation and other features are usually made based on internal decisions by HiPPOS (Highest Paid Persons Opinion). Decisions based on irrational factors such as your competitors site looks a certain way so “we should do it too”, Amazon does it, my ego wants it, and even “it looks prettier”.
A high-performing website is designed by your user’s interactions based around common website usability best practices and grown from there.
- If your users can’t easily get to (or find) what they want, they can’t buy what you have.
- If your web page, product presentation, whitepaper, etc., doesn’t provide the right value to them in their minds, they won’t be willing to exchange money, information-email address, phone number, and so on for it.
Luckily, your users are telling you how they want your site to work, look, or communicate every day in your analytics data. They tell you how they feel about the perceived value of your whitepapers when they fill out their personal information for it, or when they don’t. When you run a multivariate test, they are also telling you how they want your page to work (i.e. we convert more when your page looks like this!)
Your end user is telling you how to design your site, listen to them – they are the ones who you’re trying to convert to a lead or generate a sale from, not your co-workers. Now, why would you listen to anyone else?
photo by Darren Hester
8 Common Sins of Online Conversion Testing that Organizations Let Happen
Posted by: | CommentsThree of my conversion optimization colleagues and I had a discussion online the other day that I had proposed about the common “sins” of online conversion testing we see or hear about often in organizations. We came up with about 20 commons “sins” in about 7 minutes that we all agreed upon, and about 40 overall. Below you will find 8 of them in no particular order (with more to come in the future).
8 Common Sins of Online Conversion Testing that Organizations Let Happen:
- When running a multivariate test, after the test ends, not performing a head-to-head testing of the winning page combination and the control. The winning page combination is typically based on a prediction; a head-to-head test will further uncover the true results.
- Having too many people involved in the testing process AFTER the test is given the “go ahead”. Everyone involved should have a purpose otherwise the process slows down.
- Not believing that having no panels perform better than the control is still a win – just of a different kind; but only if you actually extract the knowledge hidden in your “loss”.
- Not setting a concrete conversion goal – know what your test hypothesis is and understand how you will analyze the data ahead of time. Alternate lessons may be and should be learned from a test but it’s vital to know exactly what and why you are testing something in the first place.
- Not allowing a test to run long-enough to accumulate enough conversions.
- Not running the control panel (this happens often) at the same exact time as the test panels.
- Letting personal opinions or biases override data in the results – the reason you test is because you really don’t know what will persuade your actual visitors best.
- No Patience - ending tests too early, or not allowing the process to happen as it should.
As bad as these are, we all agreed we were still happy that organizations have the desire to test!
Have an online conversion testing or optimization sin that you want to share or get off your chest? Let me know in the comments section.
Landing Page Optimization: Subtraction is the New Addition
Posted by: | CommentsYou’ve already been running numerous tests on your best landing pages – those that contribute the highest value to your business. Unfortunately, sometimes you’ve run out of optimization ideas or hit a few roadblocks on what you should test next for even more conversion gains. What should you do? Luckily, just as often when you are running a multivariate test or a/b test to improve the desired results of a given page on your website you will discover that you will gain improved conversion results not by altering a page element or adding a new or section to the page, but instead by removing one or more of your existing elements or sections.
Why is this so? Although each page, situation, and context is many times unique, a few of the more common reasons for the improvement in conversions include:
1) Removing distractions that enable the visitor to more clearly focus on your desired page goal.
2) Reducing the friction that forces the visitor to contemplate if the desired action is worth what is being asked of them to give in return.
3) Replacing confusing elements that prevent the visitor from understanding if they are on the correct page or even knowing what they are supposed to do next.
A few broader ranged ideas to consider include:
- Removing to clear up page real estate
- Removal to speed up page load time
- Removal of potential road blocks or barriers
More detailed removal considerations include:
- Removal of parts/all of navigation
- Removal of sections of copy
- Removal of unnecessary graphics
- Removal of just the large file size images
- Removal of flash elements (or those that require plug-ins or longer load time)
- Removal of non-vital third party java-scripts
- Removal of non-essential registration form fields
- Removal of traffic-leaks
- Removal of premiums or special offers
These should be enough start ideas to get you thinking in the right direction when you are looking at your landing page. You undoubtedly will develop various unique hypotheses for doing these (or any other “removal” ideas) based upon your own site’s data you have extracted and analyzed-or even from basic usability knowledge. The end goal is ultimately almost always the same – to uncover what page elements are negatively impacting your page’s ability to do its job properly so that you can fix them to increase the level of success your site achieves. Remember, removal testing doesn’t have to be done in isolation; removal can always be a part of any test when it’s appropriate to do so as judged by you.




