Welcome

Welcome to Josh Baker's Practical Advice for Optimizing Your Internet Marketing blog. Here you will find internet marketing optimization and online strategy articles full of tips, tricks, discussions, and thoughts to help you take your marketing and business to the next level of success.

Archive for Optimization

Bing announced Wednesday the release of their updated Bing Webmaster Tools. According to a recent blog post by Bing titled A New Beginning: Bing Webmaster Tools, they reached out to webmaster and SEO communities for ideas and suggestions on how they could improve their Webmaster Tools. They started over and rebuilt Bing Webmaster Tools from the ground up providing webmasters with more transparency, more control, and more information to aid in optimizing sites for Bing.

They focused on 3 areas in the redesigned Bing Webmaster Tools to help you optimize your websites for Bing:

  1. Crawl – to provide you with more information on crawl issues (redirects, exclusions, etc.)
  2. Index  – browse the Bing index to verify which directories & pages have been indexed
  3. Traffic –  ability to analyze up to six months of crawling, indexing, and traffic data

Bing Webmaster Tools is still not as robust as Google Webmaster Tools in the information it provides, but it is a step in the right direction. I look forward to additional features they have in the works in the coming months.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Delicious
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes Share
  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Optimization, SEO
Comments (0)

Let’s Take a Simple Multiple Choice Test:

Question: Who is your site actually built for?blue_keyboard

Hint: It’s the same group of people that should be designing your website.

Choose your Answer:
A) Your Company (web design team, marketers, IT, etc)

B) The end user (i.e. your actual or potential customers)

If you chose B, you are correct! If you chose A, then you probably work for a company whose website isn’t effective as it could be and still wondering why.

If your company is like most companies, implemented ideas and then changes to your websites layout, design, navigation and other features are usually made based on internal decisions by HiPPOS (Highest Paid Persons Opinion). Decisions based on irrational factors such as your competitors site looks a certain way so “we should do it too”, Amazon does it, my ego wants it, and even “it looks prettier”.

A high-performing website is designed by your user’s interactions based around common website usability best practices and grown from there.

  • If your users can’t easily get to (or find) what they want, they can’t buy what you have.
  • If your web page, product presentation, whitepaper, etc., doesn’t provide the right value to them in their minds, they won’t be willing to exchange money, information-email address, phone number, and so on for it.

Luckily, your users are telling you how they want your site to work, look, or communicate every day in your analytics data. They tell you how they feel about the perceived value of your whitepapers when they fill out their personal information for it, or when they don’t. When you run a multivariate test, they are also telling you how they want your page to work (i.e. we convert more when your page looks like this!)

Your end user is telling you how to design your site, listen to them – they are the ones who you’re trying to convert to a lead or generate a sale from, not your co-workers. Now, why would you listen to anyone else?

photo by Darren Hester

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Delicious
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes Share
  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Optimization
Comments (0)

Three of my conversion optimization colleagues and I had a discussion online the other day that I had proposed about the common “sins” of online conversion testing we see or hear about often in organizations.  We came up with about 20 commons “sins” in about 7 minutes that we all agreed upon, and about 40 overall. Below you will find 8 of them in no particular order (with more to come in the future).

8 Common Sins of Online Conversion Testing that Organizations Let Happen:

  1. When running a multivariate test, after the test ends, not performing a head-to-head testing of the winning page combination and the control. The winning page combination is typically based on a prediction; a head-to-head test will further uncover the true results.
  2.  

  3. Having too many people involved in the testing process AFTER the test is given the “go ahead”. Everyone involved should have a purpose otherwise the process slows down.
  4.  

  5. Not believing that having no panels perform better than the control is still a win – just of a different kind; but only if you actually extract the knowledge hidden in your “loss”.
  6.  

  7. Not setting a concrete conversion goal – know what your test hypothesis is and understand how you will analyze the data ahead of time. Alternate lessons may be and should be learned from a test but it’s vital to know exactly what and why you are testing something in the first place.
  8.  

  9. Not allowing a test to run long-enough to accumulate enough conversions.
  10.  

  11. Not running the control panel (this happens often) at the same exact time as the test panels.
  12.  

  13. Letting personal opinions or biases override data in the results – the reason you test is because you really don’t know what will persuade your actual visitors best.
  14.  

  15. No Patience - ending tests too early, or not allowing the process to happen as it should.

 

As bad as these are, we all agreed we were still happy that organizations have the desire to test!

Have an online conversion testing or optimization sin that you want to share or get off your chest? Let me know in the comments section.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Delicious
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes Share
  • Share/Bookmark

Unfortunately most ecommerce websites that I come across, a very high percentage of them are not effectively reaching their maximum level of potential performance capability, especially true of their online catalogs’ category pages. The goal of the category page is to quite simply help the potential buyer get to the right product page for the right product ultimately and hopefully ending in a sale.

What complicates the situation (although not really as complicated as one would think, and often used as an excuse, or unaware of by others) is that visitors arrive at various different stages in the buying process. This being so, the category page needs to provide the ability for the visitor at any stage of the buying process to narrow down their selections in order to easily get to the product pages of the products that fulfill their reason for being on your ecommerce website in the first place. As a refresher, here are the stages of the consumer buying process:

  1. Problem recognition or need awareness – the buyer needs to replace a broken TV, they really want a new cell phone, they want to look more stylish, etc. This can be self-recognized or realized through external sources such as peer pressure, or even marketing materials.
  2. Information search to help buyer determine possible available alternatives – examples of search include comparison shopping, internet research, word of mouth, and even the buyers own memory.
  3. Evaluation of available purchase options – deciding which features the buyer wants, etc., if you are not satisfied with the choices that you find, you end up back in the Information Search step again).
  4. Purchase decision – this is where the buyer chooses the alternative they want to buy (the actual product, the make, model, the store, etc.).
  5. Purchase – the actual purchase itself.
  6. Post purchase behavior – the evaluation of the purchase such as satisfaction or dissatisfaction.

Not all visitors will arrive to your site at the same stage in the buying process. Universally, not all visitors will go through all of the stages, and not all visitors will be at the same point inside each stage of the process, some may be just entering a specific stage, while others may be near exiting a specific stage.

Many category pages fail to help the potential buyer actually get to the right product, but rather leave it up to them to figure out what that right product is and how to get to it, on their own nonetheless. This is often ineffectively done by overcrowding category pages with individual products (or predominately featuring them on the pages most important real estate) instead of providing the functionality for the visitor to further narrow down their selections. An effective category page’s primary purpose in most ecommerce instances should not be to sell a product on that page, but to provide the “tools” to help the user further navigate to the right product or products with as much ease as possible and therefore with as little friction as possible on the way.

For example, if I am looking for a TV, and I am on your TV category page, I most likely do not want to see all of the 250 TV’s that you carry. Help me navigate to just the plasma’s, or just the LCD’s, or all TV’s by size, or all TV’s within my budget. Better yet, how about providing a “what type of TV is best for you” wizard option on the category page for those who haven’t made a decision between the various types or features or benefits and for those who aren’t as knowledgeable. They could use the help in narrowing down the available selections.

You can further break-it-down on the subcategory pages that the category page may link to – if I choose plasma TV’s on your category page, then your subcategory page needs to further give me the options to navigate the available options or features by size, by price, by resolution, by brand, again maybe a wizard to help the visitor in further choosing the right plasma TV for their purpose. Keeping all of this in mind allows for those in different buying stages to use the category pages effectively.

If you were in the canned good aisle in the supermarket and there was no rhyme or reason with the setup, the chicken noodle soup next to the canned carrots, and the canned chili next to the canned pears, and the canned tomato paste next to the canned sting beans, not to mention the sizes of the same brand and item not next to each other, how effective would you be in finding the item that you need and in the right size, you would probably get frustrated and leave to go to the supermarket down the street that presents the items in an manner that increases your usability of the canned good aisle. With the web, the user can hit the back button to the search engine and go elsewhere in seconds.

When your category pages are constructed properly and do the job they are intended to do, it’s almost effortless for the buyer to end up with the right solutions or products within seconds – increasing the chances that they will make a purchase from you rather than leaving in frustration or not finding the product they want or need. With ineffective category pages even though you may carry the right product for them, they may never actually find it in the time they have allotted to spend frustrated on your site before going elsewhere.

Now, I am not saying that you want the user to have to click through 10 pages to get where they need to be, but what I am saying is that you need to provide functionality for those at whatever stage they may be in. Those who know exactly what brand and model number may use your site search. Those who know they have $1,000 to spend on a plasma TV will take another route, and those who know they want a TV but don’t know what type or features available and don’t have a budget in mind just yet will take another route. Depending on where they are in the buying process will determine how much direction they will need (and want) and how much narrowing down they are willing to participate in to get to the right product. 

Let’s look at how Best Buy effectively uses their category pages:

Scenario: I want to purchase a new laptop, I am somewhere between the Information search and the evaluation stage (I know a fair amount about laptops, but not sure what new options are out there that I may want or need).

By selecting the Computer category on the home page I am brought to the computer category page thus allowing me to see all of the categories related to computers. I need a laptop so I recognize the picture of a laptop with the word “laptops” right below the picture, and proceed to click on it. Here is the computer category page:

best_buy_computer_category_page_1

 

I arrive at the laptop page and instantly see the headline that asks me “Which laptop is right for you” with images and links to the various subcategory pages of USES for laptops such as Entertainment, Gaming, Small Business, etc. I actually want one to use for movies, music, etc., so I click on the Entertainment link and am presented with a product listing page. Here is the laptop computer category page:

laptop_category_page_2

The product listing page lists all the products that fall under the Laptop>Entertainment Categories. But wait, on the left hand side (see the red box I added) I can also sort the products by Brand, Customer Reviews, Price, and so on, allowing me to further narrow down my selections based on more of my criteria (either known beforehand or as I uncover it during my visit). Here is the laptop product listing page:

laptop_listings_31
Just a few clicks and mere seconds after arriving at the Best Buy website, I was able to get a more or less customized list of laptop computers for entertainment usage, by Dell, within my budget. Here is the Dell laptop product listing page matching my criteria:

best_buy_dell_product_listings

I didn’t have to frustratingly search through Best Buy’s entire laptop inventory and read each of the product descriptions to determine which laptops were right for me. Their website easily guided me to the right products based on my stage of the buying process and based on the criteria I felt was important to narrow down their product selection by.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Delicious
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes Share
  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (0)

You’ve already been running numerous tests on your best landing pages – those that contribute the highest value to your business. Unfortunately, sometimes you’ve run out of optimization ideas or hit a few roadblocks on what you should test next for even more conversion gains.  What should you do? Luckily, just as often when you are running a multivariate test or a/b test to improve the desired results of a given page on your website you will discover that you will gain improved conversion results not by altering a page element or adding a new or section to the page, but instead by removing one or more of your existing elements or sections.

Why is this so? Although each page, situation, and context is many times unique, a few of the more common reasons for the improvement in conversions include:

1) Removing distractions that enable the visitor to more clearly focus on your desired page goal.

2) Reducing the friction that forces the visitor to contemplate if the desired action is worth what is being asked of them to give in return.

3) Replacing confusing elements that prevent the visitor from understanding if they are on the correct page or even knowing what they are supposed to do next.

A few broader ranged ideas to consider include:

  • Removing to clear up page real estate
  • Removal to speed up page load time
  • Removal of potential road blocks or barriers

More detailed removal considerations include:

  • Removal of parts/all of navigation
  • Removal of sections of copy
  • Removal of unnecessary graphics
  • Removal of just the large file size images
  • Removal of flash elements (or those that require plug-ins or longer load time)
  • Removal of non-vital third party java-scripts
  • Removal of non-essential registration form fields
  • Removal of traffic-leaks
  • Removal of premiums or special offers

These should be enough start ideas to get you thinking in the right direction when you are looking at your landing page. You undoubtedly will develop various unique hypotheses for doing these (or any other “removal” ideas) based upon your own site’s data you have extracted and analyzed-or even from basic usability knowledge. The end goal is ultimately almost always the same – to uncover what page elements are negatively impacting your page’s ability to do its job properly so that you can fix them to increase the level of success your site achieves. Remember, removal testing doesn’t have to be done in isolation; removal can always be a part of any test when it’s appropriate to do so as judged by you.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Delicious
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes Share
  • Share/Bookmark